HW 2 - Starting QC Calculations

2.18

Theorem

If u|=ibii| and |v=iai|i then:

u|v=iaibi

\begin{proof}

u|v=(ibii|)(iai|i)=ijbii|aj|j=ijbiaji|j=ijajbiχ(i=j)=iaibi

\end{proof}

3.5

Theorem

The Hamiltonian of a quantum state |ψ=[1,2,1] is given by H=[203010302]. Supposing, if we measure the quantum state in an arbitrary basis, which eigenvalue is the most probable? Also, calculate the expectation value of that state.

\begin{proof}
We find the eigenvalues of H. First, finding all the eigenstates implies finding all the eigenvectors for H:

p(λ)=(2λ)(1λ)(2λ)3(3)=(2λ)2(1λ)+9=(44λ+λ2)(1λ)+9=λ1=5,λ2=1,λ3=1

with corresponding e-vectors:

v1=(1,0,1),v2=(1,0,1),v3=(0,1,0)

this is our eigenbasis. We need to compose |ψ out of these:

|ψ=v1+0v2+2v3

Therefore, when we measure we'll (most likely) get λ3=1 since the number in front of v3 is the largest magnitude.

For expectation value, we just do:

H^=ψ|H^|ψ=(1,2,1)H(1,2,1)=(1,2,1)(5,2,5)=5+4+5=14

Note that if we had to do it with v1,v2 then we'd need to normalize, then find the expectation value.
\end{proof}

3.8

Theorem

The basis vectors for a qutrit are |0,|1,|2. In matrix form, the basis states are defined as:

|0=[100],|1=[010],|2=[001]

If the state of the system is defined as |ψ=2|0+3|1+5|238, and the measurement operator [200030006], what are the possible measurements? What are their probabilities?

\begin{proof}
What helps is to find the eigenvalues λi and eigenvectors |ei for our measurement operator. Notice that it's a diagonal matrix, so we can shortcut and say that |0,|1,|2 are the eigenstates, with corresponding eigenvalues of 2,3,6 respectively. These are our measurements.

To get their probabilities, we just take the magnitude of each ket:

P(|0)=|238|210.53%P(|1)=|338|223.68%P(|2)=|538|265.79%

and the measurements would be the expectation values of |0,|1,|2 respectively, which are λ1=2,λ2=3,λ3=6 respectively.
\end{proof}

5.2

Theorem

The state of a three-qubit system is described as 123(|0+|0+|1). Verify whether this is a valid quantum state. (Hint: the norm of a valid quantum state is 1.)

\begin{proof}
As the hint implies, we should make sure that |ψ is of unit length. As such:

|ψ=2|0+|123

Here, notice that if we just have the top part:

|ψ=2|0+|1|ψψ=|ψ22+12=|ψ5|ψ

Notice that our |ψ is not the same size as our norm of the same vector |ψ, which point in the same direction while |ψ is of unit length. As such, |ψ is not a valid quantum state.

Note

We can use this to show that HW 2 - Starting QC Calculations#^f307aa's |ψ is not a valid state there. However, the answer there is still correct, assuming a normalized |ψ.

\end{proof}

5.3

Theorem

The state of a qubit is described by |ψ=a|0+b|1, where a=13(1+i) and b=3.53(1+i). Check whether the wavefunction is normalized, and if it is, evaluate the probability of measuring the qubit in a state of |0 or |1.

\begin{proof}
We can determine the norm of the vector:

|ψ=|a|2+|b|2=|13(1+i)|2+|3.53(1+i)|2=1922+3.5922=2+79=1

thus the norm is 1, so |ψ is correctly normalized. To evaluate the probability of measuring the qubit in a state of |0 or |1:

P(|0)=|13(1+i)|2=29P(|1)=|3.53(1+i)|2=79

Thus it is more likely to measure the qubit in a state of |1 than |0.
\end{proof}

5.4

Theorem

When we discussed global and relative phases, it became clear that |1 and |1 are the same state, excepting up to a phase, which cannot be measured. Explain why the same argument does not hold good for the states 12(|0+|1) and 12(|0|1).

\begin{proof}
Looking back at comparing |1 and |1, the reason that these were the same state, barring phase, was that their probabilities are equivalent:

|1|H^|1|2=H2

thus why we can't measure the 180 degree phase difference in their ai's. Furthermore, when we measure them, we can do so relative to an eigenbasis where |1 is a basis vector, so the 1 factor still means that these |1's are relating to the same set of eigenvectors (as any eigenvector is a scalar multiple of some normed on, which |1 and |1 are just scalar multiples of each other).

But for this new case, notice that the negative effect doesn't occur to the whole vector, just the |1 part. If we had a flipped sign on |0 then the same argument applies. To make sure this is correct, one can consider the evolution between states:

|[21/221/2]H^[21/221/2]|2H2

\end{proof}